Utilities:
• Discussion forums
• Site Statistics
• Contact us
• Search the website

A series of articles is presented here relating to the outcome, in September 1995, of the appeal in the South Africa court case Sheikh Jassiem vs. Sheikh Nazim Mohamed and Muslim Judicial Council. This has been necessitated by the widespread propaganda and misrepresentation by various anti-Ahmadiyya organisations to the effect that this court judgment has recognised the authority of the so-called ulama to decide who is, and who is not, a Muslim, and that their declarations of Ahmadis as being non-Muslim have been accepted as legitimate by a secular court of law. It has even been claimed in press statements that "Ahmadis have been declared non-Muslim under South African law". (In this connection, to see the article go here)

• Part 1 : Summary of Appeal Judgment and the background
  Summary of final judgment and the background of the case.

• Part 2 : False propaganda by our opponents
  Translation of Urdu news-article written by Professor Khurshid Ahmad, a leading opponent of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Pakistan, who is also a well-known public figure and national politician of long standing. It is an example of how shocking (and also how amusing!) are the distortions and sheer falsehood spread by the anti-Ahmadiyya Ulama.

• Part 3 : Our reply to Professor Khurshid Ahmad

• Part 4 : Further clarification
  Secular courts do provide protection for victims of Ulama's declarations of apostasy and unbelief ('kufr').

• More misreporting of South Africa case

• A history of distortion and misrepresentation
  Our opponents' old habits die hard.