Supplement to the
Evidence
Section 10:
Clarification of Correction of an Error
|
This is in connection with the subject of Section
10. In around 1915, shortly after the Split, the assertion was first
made by the Qadianis that, in the pamphlet Correction of an error
(Ayk Ghalati Ka Izala) published in November 1901, Hazrat Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad had announced that he claimed to be a prophet and that
his previous denials of such a claim were now abrogated. To refute this
assertion of a change in Hazrat Mirzas position in November
1901, seventy of his prominent followers who had taken the pledge
into the Movement before that date, issued the following sworn public
statement:
We, the undersigned, declare on oath that when Hazrat Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement, announced
in 1891, that the prophet Jesus was dead according to the Holy Quran,
and that the son of Mary whose advent among the Muslims
was spoken of in Hadith was he [Hazrat Mirza] himself, he did not
lay claim to prophethood. However, the Maulavis misled the public,
and issued a fatwa of kufr against him by alleging that
he claimed prophethood. After this, the Promised Messiah declared
time after time in plain words, as his writings show, that to ascribe
to him a claim of prophethood was a fabrication against him, that
he considered prophethood to have come to a close with the Holy Prophet
Muhammad, and that he looked upon a claimant to prophethood, after
the Holy Prophet, as a liar and a kafir. And that the words
mursal, rasul, and nabi which had occurred in some of
his revelations, or the word nabi which had been used about
the coming Messiah in Hadith, do not denote a prophet in actual fact,
but rather a metaphorical, partial or zilli prophet who is
known as a muhaddas. After the Khatam an-nabiyyin the
Holy Prophet Muhammad, no prophet can come, neither new nor old.
We also declare on oath that we entered into the pledge of
the Promised Messiah before November 1901, and that the statements
of Mirza Mahmud Ahmad, the head of the Qadian section, that though
in the beginning Hazrat Mirza Sahib did not claim prophethood, but
that he changed his claim in November 1901, and laid claim to prophethood
on that date, and that his previous writings of ten or eleven years
denying prophethood are abrogated all this is entirely wrong
and absolutely opposed to facts. We do swear by Allah that the idea
never even entered our minds that the Promised Messiah made a change
in his claim in 1901 or that his previous writings, which are full
of denials of a claim to prophethood, were ever abrogated; nor, to
our knowledge, did we ever hear such words from the mouth of even
a single person until Mirza Mahmud Ahmad made these statements [in
1914/1915].
No person was ever able to counter this statement by testifying on oath
that as an Ahmadi he came to know in November 1901 that Hazrat Mirza,
by publishing Ayk Ghalati Ka Izala, was retracting or in some
way modifying his previous statements, of the ten-year period 1891 to
1901, in which he had clearly denied claiming prophethood and, as against
this denial, claimed to be a muhaddas.
Opening line of pamphlet
Correction of an Error opens with the following line:
Some people among my followers who are not well-acquainted
with my claim and its arguments, not having had the occasion to study
the books carefully, nor having stayed in my company for a sufficient
length of time to complete their knowledge, in some instances in response
to an objection of the opponents give a reply which is against facts.
Therefore it is the error of some followers that Hazrat Mirza is
correcting, and not any error on his own part. Moreover, the said followers
would not have committed these errors about his claims if they had studied
his previous books and statements to gain knowledge of these matters.
Therefore, Hazrat Mirza has not only confirmed here the validity of his
previous writings and statements, but has instructed that these should
be studied to get accurate information about his claims.
|